Natural Resources

Fall 2011 Natural Resources Law Class at UB

Water to burn . . . November 14, 2011

Filed under: Uncategorized — domesticatedfoxes @ 3:18 am

Whether or not you think unconventional natural gas exploration makes for good public policy, one thing’s for certain: fracing is a thirsty industry!

According to the EPA, unconventional natural gas wells in the Marcellus Shale (that’s the shale layer under much of New York and Pennsylvania) typically consume nearly four million gallons of water per “frac.” See EPA, Plan to Study the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources, 22 (November, 2011). Imagine flushing your toilet something like, say, two million times in a row. Whoosh.

Of course all that water has to come from somewhere. In some areas of intensive drilling activity, groundwater withdrawal is common; in other areas—including the Marcellus—surface water sources provide much of the water used in the drilling process. See id. at 24. Regardless of the source, most of the water pumped underground stays underground (“What happens in Vegas . . . “)—the EPA estimates somewhere between ten and thirty percent of the fracing fluid injected into each well is typically recovered in the Marcellus. See id. at 25, 42. Depending on your level of affinity for slightly radioactive water mixed with benzene and antifreeze and lots of corrosive salts, not getting it back might seem like a relative blessing. Still, unrecovered water is more or less permanently removed from the hydrologic cycle. What does that mean for a “humid” state like New York?

According to the EPA, large-scale water withdrawal—whether from surface streams and ponds or from underground wells—may substantially affect the quality of our drinking water. The EPA links high-volume groundwater withdrawal to lowered aquifer levels, increased or changing mineral solubility, increased salinity, and bacterial contamination. See id. at 25. Drawing water out of local lakes and rivers isn’t much healthier: the EPA claims substantial surface water withdrawals can harm aquatic ecosystems by changing water temperature, flow rate, and depth. See id. Contaminant concentrations may increase. See id. Needless to say, any of these eventualities may result in somewhat less potable water. See id.

In other news, New York’s Environmental Conservation Law will require—as of February 15, 2012—that anyone seeking to withdraw more than 100,000 gallons of water per day apply to the DEC for a withdrawal permit. See Dep’t of Envtl. Conservation, Water Supply & Conservation (last visited November 13, 2011). Strangely, the new law exempts all non-public entities from compliance with the permitting requirement until DEC issues regulations to guide the permitting process. See id. For the time being, DEC seems to have its hands full with its draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement and newly-minted drilling regulations. Call me crazy, but shouldn’t we have the water rules in place before we start issuing drilling permits?

http://water.epa.gov/type/goundwater/uic/class2/hydraulicfracturing /upload/ht_study_plan_110211_fina_508.pdf.

http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/313.html

Advertisements
 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s